Gobbledygoop

I haven't been posting very often and I haven't had any reason why. So here is a bunch of mixed up crap.

Today I was reading about a womans view on attraction and how we are attracted to the opposite sex. You know, men visually and women emotionally. Comments go on to state that the poor men out there have no control and that its not their fault. Sure, I understand that. But, what I don't really see is how all the comments about women state that "we" all feel the same and that we can see and attractive man and say "Yes, he's good looking" but our thoughts go no farther than that because we aren't wired that way. I beg to differ.

Comment Quote:

Men on the other hand are drawn to the womans body... in a way we arent to a mans body.
We are more "emotionally" turned on.
Because of this men I think are in the sucky position... I mean can you imagine walking around each day trying to not look at another woman.. yet everywhere they turn theres billboards with half naked women, magazine covers... girls on the street with hardly anything on, commercials, etc..etc... Its like impossible!

Ok, here's the thing. Men are truely exposed to images of the female body way more than we are to images of the male body. I suppose in a way we are bombarded more with images of the male form with a pot belly, drinking beer, sitting on the couch, watching them misbehave and act like morons and highfive eachother. What if things were different? What if on every magazine cover we saw an in shape handsom man who appears to have all his shit together AND we saw on TV a well dressed well mannered goodlooking guy married to the "average joe lady". I use this example because so many TV shows I see it seems to have a hot wife with a fat schmuck of a husband but the wife still loves him anyways. Why can't it be the other way around? Perhaps we as woman would be more visually stimulated if we were exposed to it as much as men are.

For example:



and...






We all know why Uncle Phil got that hottie don't we? If you need a hint it starts with "M" and its not Macho.

Why are there pics of chicks on a woman's mag? These pictures could easly tranfer over to a Maxim cover no prob. Also, in Maxim any article that involves woman is usually titled something like "How to trick your girlfriend into doing what you want" and "How to get your girl to fullfill even your sickest deepest fantasies". Why doesn't Cosmo have articles about how to get your boyfriend to do whatever you want? Why is it always about making him feel fantastic? Sigh, this is why I don't buy it. I want a magazine with a hot dewd on the cover felexing his muscles with no shirt on and then I want it to say "How to make him kneel on the floor, snivelling, begging for mercy and do whatever you want". Man that would rock. And then it would say "Hot pic's inside or hot men doing hot things topless, like chopping wood" I know that's a long title but I want detail. Then I would put it on the top of my toilet for all to see. He he he. It would never work...I know. They all never work it's just a bunch of bull but it still bugs me anyway. I think mostly I'm bothered because it's such an accepted excuse that men use. "I can't help myself, it's the way I was made" therefore making it totally ok to act like a horn dog because that's how he was made.

I know for a fact that I can be turned on visually. Here's a shamefull example:

I was watching Borne Identity with Matt Damon (not with Matt Damon physically or literally, this would happen only in my dreams) and that scene came on where she takes his shirt off and they have the perfect angle of his flexing bicep muscle. My boyfriend at the time tried to say something at this exact moment and I was so into Matt that I actually stuck my hand up in his face and shushed him until it was over. I got in trouble. If that's not visually stimulated I don't know what is. Once while home sick I was watching some movie they showed a scene with the leading man naked. Typically, they only show the bum. But! This time he was bending over getting into bed and they actually showed his member! I couldn't beleive it. I actually replayed it about 5 times to make sure because I was also high on demerol and thought I may be halucinating. Funny, I don't remember the movie title...just. that. one. scene.

If I see something I like I don't say in my head "Oh he's handsom". I say "ha cha cha I wonder what he looks like under that". I know, maybe it's bad and maybe I am different than some other woman out there. But, I really think that maybe if we had been exposed to it as much as men perhaps we would be just as lustful. I know though that if it were true my excuse wouldn't be "It's not my fault I was born like this!". I think it would be "I'm a horrible horney peice of crap who can't control myself. Please help."

I'm not saying its right I'm just saying this is how I am.

I would post a comment on the persons blog but I seem to cause problems when I comment and people get angry. And I think its fun to make people angry so why not do it on my blog instead?

*I just did a spell check and it actually said no misspellings found. This is an amazing day and now I know for sure that this post was meant to happen. It's fate.